On the current status of JCAMP-DX as a data transmission
standard for NMR, IR and MS
submitted to the newsgroup: bionet.stuctural-nmr MSG # 1049
by
Michael T Grzonka, Weinheim, Germany, January 1996
Contents:
- 0. Preface
- I. Historical Background
- II. The existing JCAMP standards (incl. references)
- III. JCAMP today
- IV. Future
0. PREFACE
The famous IR activities in the early days of JCAMP have been
covered earlier in this newsgroup, but there has been serious
further developments since then.
The general idea in that respect was always, that a fully
developed JCAMP should cover more than just one spectroscopy. To
the best of my knowledge I would like to summarize the current
status below.
I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
It happened as early as 1990 that the German Federal Ministry of
Research and Development had set-up a large funding programme
covering specialised information in chemistry.
Amongst the subjects funded was (and is still to the end of
1995) spectroscopy. The intentions of the German Government,
however, were much broader than just this:
beyond SpecInfo (covering the spectroscopy bit) the funding
included Beilstein, Gmelin, and the Detherm Database. All four
were developed from their ancient stages (e.g. books and
paperwork for, say, Beilstein) into electronic form. All four
databases are hosted and available to the public at STN
International (the place were you get CAS Online).
Please remember that in those days, WINDOWS and the like was
virtually non-existent, and proprietory data formats were the
credo of almost every instrument vendor (except for IR, of
course).
II. The existing JCAMP standards
Important for the further development of JCAMP, was that the
generous funding of the German government fueled a inspiring
discussion amongst the institutions and companies involved about
all subjects releated to chemical information handling.
Amongst these subjects was the exchange of chemical information.
To many of us, the early JCAMP seemed to have shown an ideal way
of how to approach this problem:
- first non-binary approach ever
- vendor independent, JCAMP is not owned by anybody
- printable characters only (important for e-mail etc.)
- reasonable compression rates (long before LHARC etc. did show
up)
- extendable and open definitions to allow further
improvements
Particularly the use of printables as the only valid characters
has proven to be a very good move, since discussions on ASCII vs.
EBCDIC, or: 8, 16, 32 bit vs. 64 bit were survived by all JCAMPs
with considerable ease.
However, there was a need for written definitions of JCAMP
standards for more than just IR, and several people in the
institutions and companies mentioned above have taken initative
to push the subject. The following standards have been proposed
and published since then:
name : JCAMP-DX, subject covered: IR-spectra
authors: R.S. McDonald and P.A. Wilks, Jr.
journal: Appl.Spectroscopy, 42(1), 151-162 (1988)
name : JCAMP-CS, subject covered: chemical structures
authors: J.Gasteiger, B.M.P. Hendirks, P.Hoever,C.Jochum and H.
Somberg
journal: Appl. Spectroscopy, 45(1), 4-11 (1991)
name : JCAMP-DX for NMR, subject covered: NMR FIDs and
spectra
authors: A.N. Davies and P. Lampen
journal: Appl. Spectroscopy, 47(8), 1093-1099 (1993)
name : JCAMP-DX for Mass Spectrometry
authors: P. Lampen, H. Hillig, A. N. Davies and M.
Linscheid
journal: Appl. Spectroscopy, 48(12), 1545-1552 (1994)
III. JCAMP today
The standards described in the above publications have been
accepted and given free for publication by the Joint Commitee on
Atomic and Molecular Physical Data (JCAMP). Meanwhile the
usefulness has been recognised by such organisations as IUPAC and
ASTM.
As outlined in the most recent of the above papers, JCAMP has
undergone several extensions and mutations to its current version
5.0. JCAMP version 5.0 is the only approved data exchange
standard which allows you to keep chemical structure, raw and
processed data of several spectroscopies, and (for NMR), signal
assignments altogether in one file. According to the early
principles, this file consists of printable ascii and is
therefore suitable for transmission and storage under today's and
tomorrow's conditions. (LHARC etc. can squeeze an additional
20-30% out of most spectra in JCAMP's DIFDUP format).
Nowadays, a lot of NMR related products have picked up JCAMP as
a format for exchange information. Although promised by all 3 big
NMR instrument manufacturers at the 6th INUM Conference in Italy
(1990), only Bruker has fully integrated JCAMP into their
software. UXNMR/XWIN-NMR as well as 1D WINNMR employ export
functions for JCAMP.
According to Steve Patt, Varian can supply a macro to export
their 1D NMR spectra into JCAMP.
The current status for JEOL is not known to me at this time
(January 1996).
SpecInfo Online (STN International) allows downloading of NMR,
IR and MS spectra from its 100,000+ documents including chemical
structure and signal assignment where appropriate. And so does
SpecInfo Inhouse.
The WINDOWS-based NMR database called WIN-SpecEdit (developed
by Bruker, BASF AG and Chemical Concepts) can import and export
its inventory of NMR information (including assigned structures)
and even email it by the press of a button - all using JCAMP as
the underlying concept.
IV. Future
Other proposals, like ADISS or netCDF, were not yet able to
convince the public in general because of various problems
arising from their binary nature or some inherent assumptions on
the binary structure of the data handled.
However, some of the proposed features are worth considering for
the future of data transmission standards. At the time of writing
this, JCAMP is the only standard ready for application and its
usefulness is out of question. The recent boost of e-mail and
other net activites may well push forward JCAMP, because easy
electronic transmission and the open, flexible nature of the
assumptions underlying this idea of a standard are of the best
available at this time.
Michael Grzonka
Facts and opinions as expressed above represent my own judgement
based on my current knowledge. Chemical Concepts must not be held
responsible, and Chemical Concepts may or may not agree with
these statements.
Your comments and suggestions on JCAMP are welcome at
rjlanc@uwimona.edu.jm
return to JCAMP-DX
page
Created, with permission from the author, by Dr. Robert J.
Lancashire,
The Department of Chemistry, University of the West
Indies,
Mona Campus, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
Created Jan 1996. Last modified 26th May 1998.
URL
http://wwwchem.uwimona.edu.jm:1104/software/jcmpsum.html